Home FEATURES I Can’t Stop EFCC From Freezing Your $15.5 Million Account, Court Tells...

I Can’t Stop EFCC From Freezing Your $15.5 Million Account, Court Tells Patience Jonathan

Wife of the former President, Dame Patience Jonathan
Wife of the former President, Dame Patience Jonathan

A Federal High Court in Lagos has turned down an application by Patience Jonathan, wife of former President Goodluck Jonathan, seeking to stop the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) from tampering with a sum of $15.591 frozen in four Skye Bank accounts.

In a brief ruling before adjourned the case to December 7, 2016 for the hearing, Justice Mohammed Idris said that he would rather grant an accelerated hearing of the case than make any order that would prejudice the outcome of the main case.

The Judge acknowledged a letter from Skye Bank’s lawyer, Lanre Ogunlesi, stating that he was indisposed and would not be able to come to court.

The EFCC had placed a ‘No Debit Order’ on the four bank accounts in July while probing Jonathan’s former Special Assistant on Domestic Affairs, Waripamo-Owei Dudafa, for money laundering.

Patience, who had laid claim to the money, filed a fundamental rights enforcement action against the EFCC, Skye Bank, Dudafa and the four companies in whose names the accounts were opened. She is urging the court to order the EFCC to remove the ‘No Debit Order’ on the accounts and to release the $15.5m to her.

At the Tuesday’s proceedings in the case, Patience’s lawyer, Mr. Ifedayo Adedipe (SAN), made an oral application, urging the judge to restrain the EFCC from tampering with the money pending the final determination of the case.

See also:  Atiku Asks Governors Of 36 States To Convene National Unity Summit To Address National Challenges

But the EFCC lawyer, Mr. Rotimi Oyedepo, opposed him, arguing that the four companies who owned the four bank accounts had been convicted of money laundering by Justice Babs Kuewumi of the same court.

“We pray the court to dismiss the application with a wave of hand. There is an order of the court that has convicted the fourth to seventh defendants for warehousing the proceeds of crime,” Oyedepo said.

He argued that the case before Justice Kuewumi would be prejudiced should Justice Idris restrain the EFCC from tampering with the money.

Oyedepo also contended that Patience did not have the locus standi to make such an application, and expressed doubt as to the validity of the addresses of the fourth to seventh defendants where Patience claimed to have served the originating summons.

Dudafa’s lawyer, Mr. Gboyega Oyewole, however, said the court bailiff had already deposed to an affidavit that the fourth to seventh defendants had been served. [myad]

Leave a Reply